Re: Is the APSL 2.0 DFSG-compliant?
On Fri, Aug 05, 2022 at 10:49:05AM +0000, Stephan Verbücheln wrote:
>On Fri, 2022-08-05 at 10:31 +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote:
>>
>> That's not a restriction, though. It's *not* saying "you may not use
>> this software for XXX", it's saying "this software is not intended
>> for XXX". There's quite a difference there IMHO.
>
>To me it sounds like a more explicit “No Warranty” clause for critical
>applications.
Yup, exactly.
--
Steve McIntyre, Cambridge, UK. steve@einval.com
Who needs computer imagery when you've got Brian Blessed?
Reply to: