On Fri, 2022-08-05 at 08:25 +0800, Paul Wise wrote: > I wouldn't put any weight on the presence of the APSL 2.0 license > text > in the archive, probably it got into Debian in those packages due to > lack of copyright/license review rather than deliberate acceptance, > especially since it is in one of the many code copies in both of > them. There could also be cases of dual-licensing. Regards