Re: Declaring license for autogenerated file (W3C)
On Fri, Jun 18, 2021 at 11:09 AM Diego M. Rodriguez wrote:
> Actually, while the upstream tarball (from PyPI) does not include the
> unicode.xml file, upon closer inspection upstream does include it in
> their GitHub releases. If using the release for packaging is technically
> viable (looks like it will be), would it be preferable from the legal side?
The upstream source (from GitHub in your case) should always be
preferred over the downstream packaging (on PyPI in your case).
Missing files, generated files, extra cruft and other things are
common problems with the downstream redistributions.
--
bye,
pabs
https://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
Reply to: