Re: do SPDX declaration fulfill §17 of GPL?
* Nicholas D. Steeves:
> I found a problematic change in one of my packages:
> This looks like a regression of license validity to me, because the
> fulfillment of §17 of the GPL was removed from the affected files, and I
> suspect that we don't accept standalone SPDX declarations as valid in
> ambiguous cases like this one...
What's §17 in your copy?