Re: do SPDX declaration fulfill §17 of GPL?
* Nicholas D. Steeves:
> Hi,
>
> I found a problematic change in one of my packages:
>
> https://github.com/KDE/kio-gdrive/commit/6321fda6294e3d021b7a2758c1200aa42debb021
>
> This looks like a regression of license validity to me, because the
> fulfillment of §17 of the GPL was removed from the affected files, and I
> suspect that we don't accept standalone SPDX declarations as valid in
> ambiguous cases like this one...
What's §17 in your copy?
Reply to: