Hi, Am 15.05.2018 um 20:04 schrieb Walter Landry: > Sven Bartscher <sven.bartscher@weltraumschlangen.de> writes: >> As there are some problems[1] with the compiled shared library as >> distributed by upstream (and because compiling things ourselves is >> always nicer) I would like to rebuild the library when building the >> Debian package, though I'm not sure if it is clear in the given >> situation that it is legal to recompile the library and distribute the >> resulting shared library. But maybe someone smarter than me can >> enlighten me. > > I think you have to ask upstream about this (i.e. Tarn Adams). Absent > any other information, I would think that you could not recompile the > source into a new binary. It is probably just an oversight on the part > of the Dwarf Fortress developers. I already tried to do that, but haven't received an answer in 4 months. Sorry, I forgot to mention that in my previous post. > I would phrase it as asking what license that part is under. There are > a few obvious choices: LGPL 2.1 or later (to match SDL), MIT, or > Apache. Please do not suggest a custom license. Regards Sven
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature