Re: Bug#897046: RFS: link-grammar/5.4.4-1 [QA upload]
Steve Langasek writes ("Re: Bug#897046: RFS: link-grammar/5.4.4-1 [QA upload]"):
> I don't think you should be taking it upon yourself to add copyright
> statements regarding debian/ contents where authors have not asserted their
> copyright up front. There is precious little in debian/, outside of
> debian/patches/, which should generally be considered copyrightable in a
> well-done package.
But also I would like to suggest that people editing debian/ should
explicitly add a CC0 dedication (or similar) somewhere.
The licence of debian/ needs to be comptatible with the licence of
the rest of the package, and it is often useful to copy fragments from
one debian/ to another.
Ian Jackson <email@example.com> These opinions are my own.
If I emailed you from an address @fyvzl.net or @evade.org.uk, that is
a private address which bypasses my fierce spamfilter.