Re: BSD license type?

[Ben Finney <bignose@debian.org>]

Ole Streicher <olebole@debian.org> writes:

> Change from the original BSD-3-Clause is that the originally second
> condition is merged/simplified with the first, and the third is
> renamed.
>
> What short name should I assign to it?

I would advise that the name should not invite confusion with the
existing license texts that actually are published prominently for the
Berkeley Standard Distribution.

In other words, if this is not identical with an existing widely-known
BSD license text, don't use BSD in the name.

You could instead choose a short name that is specific to that work.
e.g. “License: CISCO-CSA”.

-- 
 \        “[It's] best to confuse only one issue at a time.” —Brian W. |
  `\  Kernighan, Dennis M. Ritchie, _The C programming language_, 1988 |
_o__)                                                                  |
Ben Finney