Re: configure.in is missing but...
Eriberto Mota writes ("configure.in is missing but..."):
> In #882538, Helmut pointed that outguess has a configure file
> generated by a missing configure.in. He considers that configure, an
> interpreted script (shell), has no source code because the following
> I still have doubts about if this situation is a DFSG violation and I
> need more opinions.
Pabs and Helmut are right.
Can't you find a copy of the configure.ac somewhere ? If not, you may
be able to reconstruct one. Skimreading the configure script suggests
that wouldn't be too hard.
Ian Jackson <email@example.com> These opinions are my own.
If I emailed you from an address @fyvzl.net or @evade.org.uk, that is
a private address which bypasses my fierce spamfilter.