[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: configure.in is missing but...

Eriberto Mota writes ("configure.in is missing but..."):
> In #882538, Helmut pointed that outguess[1] has a configure file[2]
> generated by a missing configure.in. He considers that configure, an
> interpreted script (shell), has no source code because the following
> lines:
> I still have doubts about if this situation is a DFSG violation and I
> need more opinions.

Pabs and Helmut are right.

Can't you find a copy of the configure.ac somewhere ?  If not, you may
be able to reconstruct one.  Skimreading the configure script suggests
that wouldn't be too hard.


Ian Jackson <ijackson@chiark.greenend.org.uk>   These opinions are my own.

If I emailed you from an address @fyvzl.net or @evade.org.uk, that is
a private address which bypasses my fierce spamfilter.

Reply to: