Re: EULA vs BSL

To: IOhannes m zmölnig (Debian/GNU) <umlaeute@debian.org>
Cc: debian-legal@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: EULA vs BSL
From: Paul Wise <pabs@debian.org>
Date: Sat, 18 Nov 2017 11:48:01 +0800
Message-id: <[🔎] CAKTje6GUgsZ8G==6X4DSeh-TTMcCue5eV6K5E=W1gWMi+2fQZg@mail.gmail.com>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] fcdb1983-9d18-8716-79b6-462e678adc8a@debian.org>
References: <[🔎] fcdb1983-9d18-8716-79b6-462e678adc8a@debian.org>

On Fri, Nov 17, 2017 at 10:24 PM, IOhannes m zmölnig (Debian/GNU) wrote:

> i was playing with the idea about packaging the Decklink SDK by
> Blackmagic (this is an SDK to access digital video grabbing cards).

It might be better to invest in more Free Software friendly cards that
are supported by v4l/etc. I have no idea about this field, but I
believe the DebConf video team is now using this board:

https://hdmi2usb.tv/numato-opsis/

-- 
bye,
pabs

https://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise

Reply to:

References:
- EULA vs BSL
  - From: IOhannes m zmölnig (Debian/GNU) <umlaeute@debian.org>

Prev by Date: EULA vs BSL
Next by Date: Freeness of vague Synopsys license
Previous by thread: EULA vs BSL
Next by thread: Re: EULA vs BSL,EULA vs BSL
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread