[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Bug#875876: RFS: python-dtcwt/0.12.0-1

Herbert Fortes writes ("Re: Bug#875876: RFS: python-dtcwt/0.12.0-1"):
> [Ian Jackson:]
> > So I think that the situation is perfectly clear.  Algorithms are not
> > covered by copyright (anywhere).  The upstream author is just being
> > over-cautious in leaving in that notice.
> Why being "over-[cautious]" if the append is useless. That's the term I 
> should use at first. It is the upstream choice.

I'm afraid I don't follow.  I can't even tell if you're agreeing with
me or not.  Sorry.


Reply to: