[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: R packages licensed MIT but not shipping a copy of the MIT license itself



On Sun, Mar 20, 2016 at 12:07:06PM -0400, Paul R. Tagliamonte wrote:
> FWIW, I've been rejecting them where I see them. Mind filing serious bugs
> on those 11?

Incidentally I have sponsored one of those this morning (assuming it was
fine given that I found so many examples in the archive), and there are
2 more in the RFS queue.

Do you mind rejecting it in this case?  source is r-cran-r6 (please
write something meaningful on the reject notice, so that the sponsoree
(which is the same of the other 2) will get some more background).

-- 
regards,
                        Mattia Rizzolo

GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18  4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540      .''`.
more about me:  http://mapreri.org                              : :'  :
Launchpad user: https://launchpad.net/~mapreri                  `. `'`
Debian QA page: https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=mattia  `-

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: