[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: is igmpproxy dfsg compliant?

Pali Rohár writes ("Re: is igmpproxy dfsg compliant?"):
> On Thursday 24 November 2016 19:29:21 Roberto wrote:
> > On Thu, Nov 24, 2016 at 06:36:53PM +0100, Pali Rohár wrote:
> > > And can be included igmpproxy package into Debian?
> > 
> > Probably asking the authors if they can please switch the license, it
> > will benefit not only Debian but anyone who downloads from upstream
> > source as well.
> So... it is enough if all authors and contributors of igmpproxy agree 
> that their changes can be redistributed under GPLv2+?


> Or do they need to "relicense" their changes also under new BSD Stanford 
> too?



Ian Jackson <ijackson@chiark.greenend.org.uk>   These opinions are my own.

If I emailed you from an address @fyvzl.net or @evade.org.uk, that is
a private address which bypasses my fierce spamfilter.

Reply to: