On 01/21/2016 05:09 PM, Elmar Stellnberger wrote:
There are licenses like the vim license which force developers to ship
their patches proactively to the upstream developers and thus possibly
to the public. If the vim license does not discriminate against a
certain field of endeavour this license will not do so either.
The vim license doesn't require that. It gives you five different
choices of how to distribute modified versions, you're describing option
(a). Option (c) is to distribute as original + patches. Option (e) is to
use GPLv2+.
[And I concur with everyone else telling you not to write your own
license.]