On 18/10/15 23:27, Eriberto wrote:
Sure. I was considering that they probably *intended* it to be available underThanks Riley and Ángel! Ángel, The copyright notices in headers should be considered as priority over licenses inside generical files. So, the upstream intents provided by generical copyright files shouldn't be considered when packaging and if the files have headers. I understood your words, but the main license is non-DFSG (IMHO). Thanks a lot for your help! Regards, Eriberto
(L)GPL, and would thus be sympatetic to (properly) license under them.Not that Debian should solely rely on those files when there is more specific
copyright information. Kudos to Ben for noticing that old Changelog entry.