Re: inquery about "GPL with commercial exception"
Ben Finney <ben+debian@benfinney.id.au> writes:
> That much was already clear. It's still not a coherent license, under
> either of those conditions, and hence grants no valid license to the
> copyright holder.
I wrote that incorrectly: it should end with “… no valid license from the
copyright holder”.
--
\ “The history of Western science confirms the aphorism that the |
`\ great menace to progress is not ignorance but the illusion of |
_o__) knowledge.” —Daniel J. Boorstin, historian, 1914–2004 |
Ben Finney
Reply to: