On Wed, 1 Apr 2015 08:20:34 +0200 Alessandro Rubini <rubini@arcana.linux.it> wrote: > > [...] However, your intention is to apply a non-legally enforcable > > restriction that, were it in a license, would immediately and > > obviously fail the DFSG, [...] you are trying to (non-legally) force > > Debian to adopt a licensing scheme contrary to its values. > > How heated. You're right; I apologise. I think I'll stay out of this discussion henceforth and work on something else more enjoyable. :)
Attachment:
pgpY4Bm16K5Rs.pgp
Description: PGP signature