Re: Translated License

To: Riley Baird <BM-2cVqnDuYbAU5do2DfJTrN7ZbAJ246S4Xix@bitmessage.ch>
Cc: Jonathan Paugh <jpaugh@gmx.us>, debian-legal@lists.debian.org, Werner Lemberg <wl@gnu.org>, tobias.wendorff@tu-dortmund.de
Subject: Re: Translated License
From: Georg Pfeiffer <gp@praetor.de>
Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2014 23:52:13 +0100
Message-id: <[🔎] 1414450333.12990.4.camel@localhost>
In-reply-to: <53DDC45B.7030209@bitmessage.ch>
References: <87r46c58xi.fsf@eJus.eJus> <53DDC221.8070304@gmx.us> <53DDC45B.7030209@bitmessage.ch>

Am Sonntag, den 03.08.2014, 15:10 +1000 schrieb Riley Baird:
> > I suggest licensing under the MIT license, as is (in English),

Thank you for your opinion! We have done so already a long time ago:
http://projekte.dante.de/Trennmuster/Lizenzen

gp

Reply to:

Prev by Date: Re: GPL-3 & openssl: provide a -nossl variant for a library
Next by Date: graywolf (TimberWolf) and licensing
Previous by thread: Re: GPL-3 & openssl: provide a -nossl variant for a library
Next by thread: graywolf (TimberWolf) and licensing
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread