[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Non-freeness of the AFL v3.0

Francesco Poli writes ("Re: Non-freeness of the AFL v3.0"):
> On Tue, 4 Nov 2014 15:42:06 +0000 Ian Jackson wrote:
> > I disagree with all of your objections to #689919.
> Could you please write a (short, but reasoned) point-by-point rebuttal
> of my license analysis?

I'm afraid I don't have time.

> Walter [1] has already explained why Larry Rosen's "clarification" does not
> sound very convincing. I share his concerns.

I think this problem is overblown.


Reply to: