On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 05:20:21PM +0200, Ferenc Kovacs wrote: > "If you feel to dispute this please take your *well-formed* and > *well-thought* arguments to debian-legal." ... to discuss it. d-legal is a proper venue for *discussing* it, but it's not the right one to discuss the actual critera for archive fitness. Which is likely why you didn't get a reply. > So I was under the impression that debian-legal is the correct list to > contact. debian-legal has no delegated authority to make such decisions for the archive. > From the mails from Ondřej it seems that the reject decision was made by > the ftpmaster team, but as the argument for the decision was a legal one, > so I think that debian-legal is appropriate. ... to discuss it. Not decide on critera. > -- > Ferenc Kovács > @Tyr43l - [4]http://tyrael.hu Cheers, Paul -- .''`. Paul Tagliamonte <paultag@debian.org> | Proud Debian Developer : :' : 4096R / 8F04 9AD8 2C92 066C 7352 D28A 7B58 5B30 807C 2A87 `. `'` http://people.debian.org/~paultag `- http://people.debian.org/~paultag/conduct-statement.txt
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature