Re: Ghostscript licensing changed to AGPL
Ian Jackson writes ("Re: Ghostscript licensing changed to AGPL"):
> Philipp Kern writes ("Re: Ghostscript licensing changed to AGPL"):
> > Does that mean that people calling one of these from a script or a web
> > service (e.g. invoices using texlive-bin) will need to adhere to the
> > AGPL as well?
> Yes. [...]
I should say that this is my maximalist interpretation of the GPLv2/3
scope, which is not generally accepted. Most people seem to think
that putting things in different processes is enough to separate them
from the GPL's scope.