On Sun, 16 Feb 2014 20:07:55 +0100 Erik Josefsson <erik.hjalmar.josefsson@gmail.com> wrote: > On 02/16/2014 07:04 PM, Miriam Ruiz wrote: > > So it's hard to say that it's not DFSG-free. > > Is it? > > Piana writes: > > "Moreover, being a purportedly strong copyleft license, it would be > outright (and both ways) incompatible with the most widely used copyleft > license, the GNU GPL, and very likely incompatible with many others. > This was well understood by the drafters, who decided to use a clever > solution to avoid the EUPL being cut off from software development in > combination with a large share of the software publicly available." From which thread is that? If it's from the discussion about the draft, it's most probably outdated. The EUPL 1.1 is explicitly compatible with the GPLv2 and some other licenses. > > //Erik > > > -- > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-legal-REQUEST@lists.debian.org > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org > Archive: [🔎] 53010C8B.7000905@gmail.com">http://lists.debian.org/[🔎] 53010C8B.7000905@gmail.com >
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature