[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: data and software licence incompatabilities?



On Tue, 27 Aug 2013 14:37:24 -0700 Steve Langasek wrote:

[...]
> You have a right to your own opinion.  You do *not* have a right to express
> it *on this list*.  The purpose of this list is to provide guidance to
> maintainers and upstreams regarding *Debian's* definition of free software,
> as well as guidance regarding the *legality* of particular combinations of
> works.  You using the list as a soapbox for your opinions about licenses
> that you think Debian *shouldn't* accept is an abuse of the list.

Sorry, but I think I am *not* abusing this list by just expressing my
own opinions on the acceptability of licenses.

The description of this list says [1]:
"Discussions about legality issues such as copyrights, patents etc."

[1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/

There cannot be *any* discussions, if, for each given topic, only *one*
opinion is allowed to be expressed, and any other dissenting opinion is
banned.



-- 
 http://www.inventati.org/frx/frx-gpg-key-transition-2010.txt
 New GnuPG key, see the transition document!
..................................................... Francesco Poli .
 GnuPG key fpr == CA01 1147 9CD2 EFDF FB82  3925 3E1C 27E1 1F69 BFFE

Attachment: pgpe0auKvOjhT.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: