On Thu, 10 Jan 2013 22:21:52 +0100 Simon Josefsson wrote: > Francesco Poli <invernomuto@paranoici.org> writes: [...] > > it's unclear which (copyright) license has been chosen > > *by* the Open Web Foundation to release the document *to the public*. > > > > I would say that this license is what is relevant to answer the > > important question "does draft-dmarc-base-00-02.txt.gz comply with > > the DFSG?". > > Good catch and I agree Thank you! [...] > So doesn't it look like there is no clear license at all for > draft-dmarc-base-00-02.txt? It definitely seems so. > If nobody has other input, I am inclined to > open a bug report on 'opendmarc' about this. I would encourage you to indeed file such a bug report against the package. Thanks for your time! Bye. -- http://www.inventati.org/frx/frx-gpg-key-transition-2010.txt New GnuPG key, see the transition document! ..................................................... Francesco Poli . GnuPG key fpr == CA01 1147 9CD2 EFDF FB82 3925 3E1C 27E1 1F69 BFFE
Attachment:
pgpYJaEjrw_mo.pgp
Description: PGP signature