[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Bug#686580: netdiag: Strobe license is incorrectly stated as GPL



On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 07:59:17PM +0700, Ivan Shmakov wrote:
> >>>>> Matthaeus Wander <mwander@swznet.de> writes:
> 
>  > Package: netdiag
>  > Version: 1.0-13
>  > Severity: minor
> 
> 	AIUI, the Strobe license (as quoted below) fails to meet DFSG 1.
> 	Therefore, my guess is that the severity of this bug has to be
> 	raised to ‘grave’.  (Which I'll do unless there be objections.)
> 
> 	TIA.
> 
>  > In doc/netdiag/copyright the license of strobe is stated as GPL and
>  > claimed to be taken from strobe-1.06.tar.gz.  The upstream archive
>  > does not mention GPL, instead the manpage and the COPYRIGHT file say:
> 
>  > --copy--
>  > Copyright (c) Julian Assange 1995-1999, All rights reserved.
> 
>  > This software has only three copyright restrictions. Firstly, this
>  > copyright notice must remain intact and unmodified. Secondly, the
>  > Author, Julian Assange, must be appropriately and prominantly
>  > credited in any documentation associated with any derived work.
>  > Thirdly unless otherwise negotiated with the author, you may not
>  > sell this program commercially, reasonable distribution costs
>  > excepted.
> 
>  > Use and or distribution of this software implies acceptance of the
>  > above.
>  > --paste--

This looks very much non-free and should be moved to non-free
immediately, or removed from the archive.

Cranking up severity is a *good* move, I would do it, but I see you
intend to.

Godspeed.

-- 
 .''`.  Paul Tagliamonte <paultag@debian.org>
: :'  : Proud Debian Developer
`. `'`  4096R / 8F04 9AD8 2C92 066C 7352  D28A 7B58 5B30 807C 2A87
 `-     http://people.debian.org/~paultag

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Reply to: