[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Tagged as PD, clear enough?

On Tue, 2012-01-03 at 10:54 -0500, Clark C. Evans wrote:
> It seems that the FSF has endorsed CC0, which has not only
> a public domain statement but also a permissive license for
> as a backup license.  The OSI also seems to like this license
> and is looking at approving it.  Perhaps the author could be 
> convinced to use the CC0 dedication / license?
> Clark

Possibly, and I've hinted at this in comments left on the content page,
but for me to actively seek out and request a re-license like this I'd
like to know that it is clearly required, as well. One reason being that
if it's tagged as PD, I guess the author expects not to be pestered
about it too much license-wise :)

Martin Erik Werner <martinerikwerner@gmail.com>

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Reply to: