On Wed, 14 Dec 2011 14:18:41 -0500 Clark C. Evans wrote:
> Is there a debian-legal position on "Appropriate Legal Notices"
> aspect of the GPLv3. Including 5(d) and 7(b);
I don't think there's a debian-legal position (whatever that may mean)
on the GNU GPL v3.
My own personal analysis may be found here:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2007/06/msg00267.html
In extreme summary, I dislike both clause 5(d) and clause 7(b).
> OR, alternatively,
> the OSI approved Common Public Attribution License ("CPAL").
[...]
This license was discussed on debian-legal and considered as failing to
meet the DFSG, if I recall correctly:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2007/09/msg00165.html
http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2007/09/msg00238.html
http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2007/09/msg00173.html
http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2007/09/msg00174.html
--
http://www.inventati.org/frx/frx-gpg-key-transition-2010.txt
New GnuPG key, see the transition document!
..................................................... Francesco Poli .
GnuPG key fpr == CA01 1147 9CD2 EFDF FB82 3925 3E1C 27E1 1F69 BFFE
Attachment:
pgpueifktEy0P.pgp
Description: PGP signature