Re: Are Web-API packages need to be in the 'main' repo ?

To: debian-legal@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Are Web-API packages need to be in the 'main' repo ?
From: Alexey Eromenko <al4321@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2011 08:46:47 +0200
Message-id: <[🔎] CAOJ6w=GXECZriUbiM2-mfwLv5n2dzABkh8tD-9aNAfA7yErAZg@mail.gmail.com>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 1323122781.28988.140661007794685@webmail.messagingengine.com>
References: <CAOJ6w=EhP-5S-p03=8DQXTo_OUz0ygqAQzdM692zWo=1JY2Ydg@mail.gmail.com> <20111205182532.GB3575@think.nuvreauspam> <[🔎] CAOJ6w=FkOqobAzvAwSsfrNCMjYJJbdAY68q9xADWwkJ=e-X8Rw@mail.gmail.com> <[🔎] 20111205205138.GK3575@think.nuvreauspam> <[🔎] 1323122781.28988.140661007794685@webmail.messagingengine.com>

In addition, once we come to conclusion of this topic, we must clarify
the definition of 'contrib' repository regarding to Web API /
dependency on the web.

For example, free software in 'main' must *not* download non-free
modules from the Internet silently. This is important.

so... what's the next step ?
Open bug reports against those 'facebook' packages and ask maintainers
to move it to 'contrib' repo ?

-- 
-Alexey Eromenko "Technologov"

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Are Web-API packages need to be in the 'main' repo ?
  - From: "Christofer C. Bell" <christofer.c.bell@gmail.com>

References:
- Re: Are Web-API packages need to be in the 'main' repo ?
  - From: Alexey Eromenko <al4321@gmail.com>
- Re: Are Web-API packages need to be in the 'main' repo ?
  - From: Andrei Popescu <andreimpopescu@gmail.com>
- Re: Are Web-API packages need to be in the 'main' repo ?
  - From: "Clark C. Evans" <cce@clarkevans.com>

Prev by Date: Re: Are Web-API packages need to be in the 'main' repo ?
Next by Date: Re: Are Web-API packages need to be in the 'main' repo ?
Previous by thread: Re: Are Web-API packages need to be in the 'main' repo ?
Next by thread: Re: Are Web-API packages need to be in the 'main' repo ?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread