Re: CMU LTI Licence
Here are some comments on this license.
Ben Finney <ben+debian@benfinney.id.au> writes:
> ## Permission is hereby granted, free of charge, to use and distribute ##
> ## this data and its documentation without restriction, including ##
> ## without limitation the rights to use, copy, modify, merge, publish, ##
> ## distribute, sublicense, and/or sell copies of this work, and to ##
> ## permit persons to whom this work is furnished to do so, subject to ##
> ## the following conditions: ##
All the DFSG-required permissions are granted. Good so far.
> ## 1. The data must retain the above copyright notice, this list of ##
> ## conditions and the following disclaimer. ##
Effectively the same as other requirements in many free software works.
No problem.
> ## 2. Any modifications must be clearly marked as such. ##
This kind of requirement is conventionally interpreted to be satisfied
by the inclusion of a detailed changelog file. No problem.
> ## 3. The author names and institution are retained. ##
This will be done automatically by clause 1 and the changelog, so I
don't see the point of repeating it. No problem, though.
> ## 4. Neither the authors nor the institution are used to endorse or ##
> ## promote products derived from this data without specific prior ##
> ## written permission. ##
Another common restriction conventionally regarded as acceptable for
free software works. No problem.
> ## 5. Any commercial, public or published work that uses this data ##
> ## must contain a clearly visible acknowledgment as to the ##
> ## provenance of the data. ##
I don't really know what this means. It clearly places a restriction on
a field of endeavour (“commercial, public or published work”), but I
don't know whether it violates DFSG §6. Other opinions required.
> ## CARNEGIE MELLON UNIVERSITY AND THE CONTRIBUTORS TO THIS WORK ##
> ## DISCLAIM ALL WARRANTIES WITH REGARD TO THIS DATA OR SOFTWARE, ##
[…]
Warranty disclaimers are conventionally regarded as unproblematic for DFSG.
Francis Tyers <ftyers@prompsit.com> writes:
> I think this is a DFSG-free licence.
The only reservation I have is the one above, about the license's clause
5.
> Any other thoughts ?
Thank you for your attention to detail in checking the freedom granted
in this work.
--
\ “You can be a victor without having victims.” —Harriet Woods |
`\ |
_o__) |
Ben Finney
Reply to: