Re: CDDL/GPL and Nexenta (with CDDL libc)

To: debian-legal@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: CDDL/GPL and Nexenta (with CDDL libc)
From: Matthew Johnson <mjj29@debian.org>
Date: Fri, 3 Sep 2010 09:06:43 +0100
Message-id: <[🔎] 20100903080643.GL16143@matthew.ath.cx>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] AANLkTi=1ZYkZ2KOnNRDVJXFwM51FHLaUX41bg9+L+b5p@mail.gmail.com>
References: <AANLkTi=SE93fTncDpnmqmM0Mfm_AGu+-eSdfjrZ0Siaq@mail.gmail.com> <20100809180225.GS31014@rzlab.ucr.edu> <AANLkTi=1G1STbfW_ziEuMpDySHOg8PLpQigBskj81_+c@mail.gmail.com> <20100812232136.GU31014@rzlab.ucr.edu> <[🔎] 20100902224530.GM22469@rzlab.ucr.edu> <[🔎] AANLkTi=VyPNmbD5DCQi+ehDiAmExoe_eLdhxWQfiOE_0@mail.gmail.com> <[🔎] AANLkTi=1ZYkZ2KOnNRDVJXFwM51FHLaUX41bg9+L+b5p@mail.gmail.com>

On Fri Sep 03 14:04, Paul Wise wrote:
> BTW, whatever happened to Debian GNU/kOpenSolaris?
> 
> http://csclub.uwaterloo.ca/~dtbartle/opensolaris/
> 

How would the licence interactions work here, with a CDDL kernel and a GPL
libc/userland? Does the fact that it's specifically the kernel satisfy the
exceptions in the GPL?

Matt

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply to:

References:
- CDDL/GPL and Nexenta (with CDDL libc)
  - From: Don Armstrong <don@debian.org>
- Re: CDDL/GPL and Nexenta (with CDDL libc)
  - From: Anil Gulecha <anil@nexenta.org>
- Re: CDDL/GPL and Nexenta (with CDDL libc)
  - From: Paul Wise <pabs@debian.org>

Prev by Date: Re: CDDL/GPL and Nexenta (with CDDL libc)
Next by Date: Moodle trademark
Previous by thread: Re: CDDL/GPL and Nexenta (with CDDL libc)
Next by thread: Re: CDDL/GPL and Nexenta (with CDDL libc)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread