Quoting Dererk on 2010-04-08 19:05:39: > I was asked to verify that the license below does meet DFSG, before > releasing the software itself Preemptive disclaimers: I am not a DD, ftpmaster, lawyer, or policy hacker. In short, I'm simply talking from my corpulent posterior here. I'm in agreement with Charles on this, but might have different logic as to how I reached this conclusion. To me it appears this license is DFSG free, as it provides the option to distribute under one of several licenses, each in as far as I know dfsg. It seems, from a lay read, that this is a more verbose and detailed version of a fairly typical multi-licensing scenario. -- _ Brian Ryans 8B2A 54C4 E275 8CFD 8A7D 5D0B 0AD0 B014 C112 13D0 . ( ) ICQ UIN: 43190205 | Mail/MSN/Jabber: BrianLRyans@gmail.com ..: X ASCII Ribbon Campaign Against HTML mail and v-cards: asciiribbon.org / \ Any technology distinguishable from magic is insufficiently advanced
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature