Re: The Software shall be used for Good, not Evil.
Alexander Reichle-Schmehl wrote:
> Josselin Mouette schrieb:
>> Definitely non-free, and the author’s clarification removes any doubt.
> Hmmm... Actually... As he didn't gave a definition of "good" or "evil"
> one could argue, that everything is good... for someone.
> However, I would strongly advise to not package that thing for Debian
> main; it smells like problems.
We must not discriminate against fields of endeavor (so people wanting to do
"evil" must be able to), but this license doesn't seem to restrict
redistribution, thus making this "Good but no Evil" software suited for non-
free, no ?
Or did I misread your message ?