Re: Why is OpenSSL not in non-free?
On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 12:23:56PM +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Le mercredi 25 février 2009 à 12:46 +0200, Adrian Bunk a écrit :
> > - the 4-clause BSD license with the advertising clause is considered
> > non-free
>
> No.
Ah, OK.
Could someone update http://wiki.debian.org/DFSGLicenses and
http://www.debian.org/legal/licenses/ accordingly?
Currently both pages sound as if it the 4-clause BSD licence would not
meet the DFSG.
> Even the FSF considers it free.
The FSF also considers the GFDL with invariant sections as free...
cu
Adrian
--
"Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
"Only a promise," Lao Er said.
Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed
Reply to: