Re: RFC: licence of ITP: s3sync-ruby

To: MJ Ray <mjr@phonecoop.coop>
Cc: 510493@bugs.debian.org, debian-legal@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: RFC: licence of ITP: s3sync-ruby
From: Florian Weimer <fw@deneb.enyo.de>
Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2009 10:57:39 +0100
Message-id: <[🔎] 87eizbv5yk.fsf@mid.deneb.enyo.de>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 496096e6.onTroeSIDuONBz0f%mjr@phonecoop.coop> (MJ Ray's message of "Sun, 04 Jan 2009 11:00:54 +0000")
References: <[🔎] 496096e6.onTroeSIDuONBz0f%mjr@phonecoop.coop>

* MJ Ray:

> 3. is the licence any obstacle to meeting DFSG?

It doesn't mention the act of running the program or using it.
Or does this activity fall under "display"?

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: RFC: licence of ITP: s3sync-ruby
  - From: MJ Ray <mjr@phonecoop.coop>

References:
- RFC: licence of ITP: s3sync-ruby
  - From: MJ Ray <mjr@phonecoop.coop>

Prev by Date: Re: BSD license with Mozilla-style name clause
Next by Date: Re: bash completion script licensing
Previous by thread: Re: Bug#510493: RFC: licence of ITP: s3sync-ruby
Next by thread: Re: RFC: licence of ITP: s3sync-ruby
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread