[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Artistic and LGPL compatibility in jar files

On Dec 17, 2009, at 12:19 AM, Matthew Johnson wrote:
> I assume, then, that it can function without that non-free file?

Yes. Either it provides validation capabilities they don't need, or they have some hand-written code to deal with the parts that were automated because of having the schema around.


Reply to: