[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Artistic and LGPL compatibility in jar files



On Mon, 14 Dec 2009 19:36:58 +0000 Anthony W. Youngman wrote:

[...]
> That's why, actually, given the choice of LGPL 2.1 or 3, much as I 
> haven't investigated 3 very much, I'll almost certainly prefer 3 to 2.1 
> because it means other people CAN'T relicence my code :-)

Please note that adopting the LGPLv3 makes the work not linkable with
GPLv2 (only) works.

If you choose the LGPL in order to obtain a weak copyleft that allows
linking with proprietary code, forbidding linking with GPLv2 code looks
a bit awkward...

-- 
 New location for my website! Update your bookmarks!
 http://www.inventati.org/frx
..................................................... Francesco Poli .
 GnuPG key fpr == C979 F34B 27CE 5CD8 DC12  31B5 78F4 279B DD6D FCF4

Attachment: pgp84WTSjFCTj.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: