Re: RFS: spim
Mackenzie Morgan <email@example.com> writes:
> On Monday 19 October 2009 5:10:54 am Ben Finney wrote:
> > Okay. The Debian project still needs the copyright holder's explicit
> > license to redistribute, otherwise the work can't even be in
> > ‘non-free’.
> I talked to Larus and he said he would send a statement to Debian
> Legal. Does that work?
Possibly, depending on how it's done.
Better would be for the copyright holder to re-release the work, with
the license terms changes to include all the freedoms in a single
document in the work. That way it's obvious to everyone what the full
set of license terms is.
\ “All television is educational television. The question is: |
`\ what is it teaching?” —Nicholas Johnson |