[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Why is OpenSSL not in non-free?

On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 12:23:56PM +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Le mercredi 25 février 2009 à 12:46 +0200, Adrian Bunk a écrit :
> > - the 4-clause BSD license with the advertising clause is considered
> >   non-free
> No.

Ah, OK.

Could someone update http://wiki.debian.org/DFSGLicenses and 
http://www.debian.org/legal/licenses/ accordingly?

Currently both pages sound as if it the 4-clause BSD licence would not
meet the DFSG.

> Even the FSF considers it free.

The FSF also considers the GFDL with invariant sections as free...



       "Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
        of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
       "Only a promise," Lao Er said.
                                       Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed

Reply to: