Re: Why is OpenSSL not in non-free?
On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 12:46:03PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> - the 3-clause BSD license is considered free
> - the 4-clause BSD license with the advertising clause is considered
> non-free
> - both the OpenSSL License and the Original SSLeay License in
> /usr/share/doc/libssl0.9.8/copyright contain the BSD advertising
> clause in its exact wording
>
> Does OpenSSL have to go to non-free, or do I miss anything?
It's not GPL-compatible. This is not the same as non-free.
http://www.gnu.org/licenses/license-list.html#OriginalBSD
--
Benjamin M. A'Lee || mail: bma@subvert.org.uk
web: http://subvert.org.uk/~bma/ || gpg: 0xBB6D2FA0
Reply to: