Hello, On Sun, 18 Jan 2009 13:49:35 +0100, Mark Weyer wrote: > What I am looking for: > - Copyleft with source requirement, but should not contaminate other > software. > - No additional burden on anyone. In particular no requirements for > derivatives to advertize, to not advertize, to follow some naming > convention, or to convey source code at runtime. > - No distinction between programs, libraries, images, scripts, > documentation, or whatever. > Formulations should equally apply to all sorts of software. > The only distinction should be source vs. non-source. > - Oh, and of course it should be DFSG-free. > > Also, I am very sceptical about patent retaliation clauses. What about a BSD-like license [0], or also the MIT/X11 license [1]? [0] /usr/share/common-licenses/BSD -- obviously change "The Regents of the University of California" (and all references to the University) to your name/company/whatever. [1] http://www.opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.php Both seem to conform to your requirements, if I'm not mistaken. Kindly, David -- . ''`. Debian maintainer | http://wiki.debian.org/DavidPaleino : :' : Linuxer #334216 --|-- http://www.hanskalabs.net/ `. `'` GPG: 1392B174 ----|---- http://snipr.com/qa_page `- 2BAB C625 4E66 E7B8 450A C3E1 E6AA 9017 1392 B174
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature