Re: Please give opinion about "Bug#509287: afio: license is non-free"
* MJ Ray:
> More seriously, the Lachman Associates licence doesn't give any
> permission to modify the software, does it?
Right, this is clearly a problem. Consequently, the dubious state of
licensing does not matter much (except if you buy into the "stack of
licenses" idea, which we generally don't, except maybe for Python).
> So, I feel we should either claim that we believe the SunSite summary
> for some reason that I can't see, seek relicensing from
> Sun/Verizon/Kodak, or drop the package as undistributable.
Undistributable because it's been modified, contrary to the original
license terms? Hmm.
Reply to: