Re: AGPL and Debian
> All of those services are usually only for code that is to be hosted for
> the public. I consider the claim that there will be enough hosting
> services for people needing to put their personal modifications not
> suiteable for a general public consumption and not interested in any
> further work to be put in that project quite short sighted and hard to
> believe once there will be some more of those projects and some more
> people using them.
if you are doing changes to the service that are not suitable for
general public then you surely not let the public access them at all in
the first place?! Otherwise they would be suitable for them and yes,
then you have to offer a possibility to get to the source.
* libpng2 no libpng3 no why ? because no yes no yes no yes bullshit no yes
no yes no yes stop ? no when someday beep beep beep beep (Closes: #157011)
-- Christian Marillat <email@example.com> Thu, 29 Aug 2002 16:41:58 +0200