Re: AGPL3 and client code
At Mon, 10 Nov 2008 22:46:37 +0100,
Francesco Poli wrote:
> I personally think that software solely released under the terms of the
> GNU AfferoGPL v3 fails to comply with the DFSG (i.e.: is non-free).
It turns out there is already AGPL software  in sid/main as
Miriam Ruiz points out  in a blog entry.
Does that mean that the question of DFSG freeness of the AGPL of is settled,
at least for the moment?