Bug#493421: DFSG-compliance of Unicode Copyright
- To: email@example.com
- Subject: Bug#493421: DFSG-compliance of Unicode Copyright
- From: Niko Tyni <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- Date: Sat, 2 Aug 2008 20:38:55 +0300
- Message-id: <20080802173855.GB3828@rebekka>
- Reply-to: Niko Tyni <email@example.com>, firstname.lastname@example.org
- In-reply-to: <20080724154201.GN18214@pc110.lyon.inserm.fr>
- References: <20080724122430.GH18214@pc110.lyon.inserm.fr> <20080724145242.GA10421@infernal.debian.net> <20080724154201.GN18214@pc110.lyon.inserm.fr>
On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 05:42:01PM +0200, Rafael Laboissiere wrote:
> * Andreas Bombe <email@example.com> [2008-07-24 16:52]:
> > On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 02:24:30PM +0200, Rafael Laboissiere wrote:
> > > Does anyone know whether the Unicode Copyright  is DFSG-compliant?
> > >
> > > The file /usr/share/perl/5.10.0/unicore/Blocks.txt in perl-modules is
> > > released under this license, but there is no mention to it in
> > > /usr/share/doc/perl-modules/copyright.
> > >
> > >  http://www.unicode.org/copyright.html
> > The license is already used in main for packages such as unicode-data.
> > perl-modules should of course mention it in its copyright file if a part
> > of it uses it.
> Indeed, the license appears in /usr/share/doc/unicode-data/copyright.
> Thanks for the pointer.
> (I am forwarding this message to the perl-modules package maintainers, since
> they need to take some action. Should I file a bug report for that?)
Sure, doing that now. Thanks for noting this.
Niko Tyni firstname.lastname@example.org