Re: Doxygen Documentation from LGPL source under CC-BY-SA-2.5

["LI Daobing (李道兵)" <lidaobing@gmail.com>]

Hello,

On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 4:31 AM, Andres Mejia <mcitadel@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I know the CC-BY-SA-2.5 license is considered non-free. The api documentation
> in the ogre-doc package is under this license. Suppose upstream decided to
> use CC-BY-SA-3.0 instead. Would this still be allowed if the documentation is
> generated from LGPL source files?
>
I think you can regenerate it again, so it can be under LGPL license



-- 
Best Regards,
 LI Daobing