On Mon, 14 Apr 2008 11:45:23 -0500 Gunnar Wolf wrote: > Alexander Schmehl dijo [Mon, Apr 14, 2008 at 06:24:36PM +0200]: [...] > > Talked to Jörg Jaspert about that (you need to do something during work > > time, don't you?), and this clause is indeed free (since it's so > > ridiculous easy to circumvent^W fullfill). So for the sake of gaming, > > bundle it with any kind of script, and be done with it. I agree that this restriction does *not* fail the DFSG, but, as said elsewhere in this same thread, it's silly. It can be easily circumvented, so it's useless. See my 2-byte script example in http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2006/12/msg00077.html As usual, my disclaimers are: IANAL, TINLA, IANADD, TINASOTODP. > > But please try to make this world a saner place by talking about this > to the upstream author. Yes, I definitely agree that upstream could be suggested to drop such a useless restriction and adopt the plain (unmodified) zlib license. -- http://frx.netsons.org/progs/scripts/refresh-pubring.html New! Version 0.6 available! What? See for yourself! ..................................................... Francesco Poli . GnuPG key fpr == C979 F34B 27CE 5CD8 DC12 31B5 78F4 279B DD6D FCF4
Attachment:
pgppKWCFRBbxU.pgp
Description: PGP signature