[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Falcon P.L. license (ITP:Bug#460591)

On sam, 2008-03-22 at 22:33 +0100, Giancarlo Niccolai wrote:
> > Have you considered the GNU LGPL (v2.1)?
> >
> Yes, but I encountered strong resistance from FSF when proposing a
> "lighter" (with exceptions) LGPL version.

This is, again, because you are not proposing additional permissions
(for which the LGPL with extra additional permissions would be fine) but
additional *restrictions*.

: :' :      We are debian.org. Lower your prices, surrender your code.
`. `'       We will add your hardware and software distinctiveness to
  `-        our own. Resistance is futile.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message =?ISO-8859-1?Q?num=E9riquement?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_sign=E9e?=

Reply to: