On Fri, 29 Feb 2008 12:08:28 +0100 Thibaut Paumard wrote: [...] > He answered basically that the license itself is clearly stated > (which is true), and that since it is GPL, the copyright is > unimportant and I shouldn't care. > > Now, should I? If yes, could you give me a couple of arguments I > could use to convince the authors to do something about it? One argument could be that the GPL itself requires that appropriate copyright notices accompany the work. See GPLv2, Section 1, which grants you the permission to copy and distribute (verbatim) copies of the source code | provided that you conspicuously and appropriately publish on each copy | an appropriate copyright notice and disclaimer of warranty; I hope this helps. My standardized disclaimers: IANAL, TINLA, IANADD, TINASOTODP. -- http://frx.netsons.org/progs/scripts/refresh-pubring.html New! Version 0.6 available! What? See for yourself! ..................................................... Francesco Poli . GnuPG key fpr == C979 F34B 27CE 5CD8 DC12 31B5 78F4 279B DD6D FCF4
Attachment:
pgpJoViE1nOeA.pgp
Description: PGP signature