Re: Design Science License (in freevo)
Francesco Poli <email@example.com> wrote:
> On Tue, 15 Jan 2008 16:29:15 +0000 (GMT) MJ Ray wrote:
> > It seems impractical, but the definition of Object Form and the terms
> > for modified versions make it look to me like it's avoidable by loading
> > the graphic at run-time instead of compiling it into an executable.
> Only if those graphics files are directly loadable from their Source
> form. [...]
Otherwise, you make a modified work and the meanings of Source Data,
Author and Object Form change, as far as I can see. Silly, but helpful.
> That is to say, you think that it complies with the DFSG, even though
> it's impractical. Did I get it right? Is this what you mean?
My Opinion Only: see http://people.debian.org/~mjr/
Please follow http://www.uk.debian.org/MailingLists/#codeofconduct