[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Design Science License (in freevo)

Francesco Poli <frx@firenze.linux.it> wrote:
> On Tue, 15 Jan 2008 16:29:15 +0000 (GMT) MJ Ray wrote:
> > It seems impractical, but the definition of Object Form and the terms
> > for modified versions make it look to me like it's avoidable by loading
> > the graphic at run-time instead of compiling it into an executable.
> Only if those graphics files are directly loadable from their Source
> form. [...]

Otherwise, you make a modified work and the meanings of Source Data,
Author and Object Form change, as far as I can see.  Silly, but helpful.

> That is to say, you think that it complies with the DFSG, even though
> it's impractical.  Did I get it right?  Is this what you mean?

My Opinion Only: see http://people.debian.org/~mjr/
Please follow http://www.uk.debian.org/MailingLists/#codeofconduct

Reply to: