Le dimanche 30 septembre 2007 à 20:24 +0200, Kern Sibbald a écrit : > > > However, the concept of deleting parts of the license don't appeal to me. > > > I prefer the following which is a modification of my prior license that > > > was accepted by Debian. The modification makes my prior license a bit > > > more specific -- i.e. it restricts it to OSI licensed libraries. > > > > Well, any exception that you add to the GPL can be removed, this is by > > design of the GPL. This is also true of the other wording you suggested. > > It isn't really important, but I'd be surprised if that is true as it the > author of the code can decide anything he/she wants by modifying the GPL. Yes, it is possible, but in this case I don't think the resulting license is compatible with the GPL; if these new terms must me supplemented for all derived versions, that makes them "further restrictions". -- .''`. Josselin Mouette /\./\ : :' : josselin.mouette@ens-lyon.org `. `' joss@debian.org `- Debian GNU/Linux -- The power of freedom
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message =?ISO-8859-1?Q?num=E9riquement?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_sign=E9e?=