[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Bacula and OpenSSL



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Hi Kern

Kern Sibbald wrote:
> Yes, and in addition, after Josselin's email, I did a bit of research, and for 
> at least one of the files that we use (fnmatch.c), the FSF license was 
> changed from GPL to LGPL sometime in 2004 the best I can tell.  
> Unfortunately, we are still using the old GPL'ed version rather than the 
> newer LGPL'ed version.
> While it would be best to convert to the newer version, it is not so easy as 
> the we have made some modifications to the old one to support Win32 systems 
> (stupid difference of path separators, ...).  
> Question: for old GPL'ed versions of fnmatch.c and fnmatch.h that we are using 
> copyrighted in 1997 by FSF, would it be possible to modify them to use the 
> LGPL as you are currently doing?
> That would give me a bit of breathing room (i.e. no recoding for the moment).  
> Long term, I am probably going to use your newer LGPLed version since it 
> supports UTF-8, but that will take some modifications and lots of testing.

FSF would need to answer this question directly.  FSF and FSFE are
sister organisations but we are administratively separate.  I will pass
this question onward off-list. :)

> However, one important issue to work through is Josselin's claim that due to 
> the wording in GPL v3, I could switch to it, and it would be OK to link 
> OpenSSL in as shared objects.

I am discussing this with Brett Smith at the moment.

Regards

Shane

- --
Shane Coughlan
FTF Coordinator
Free Software Foundation Europe
Office: +41435000366 ext 408 / Mobile: +41792633406
coughlan@fsfeurope.org
Support Free Software > http://fsfe.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)

iQCVAwUBRpuLqNGa7CzA5hXyAQL84gP8DyjLbDbgKtoyXdvIukFnmOzgBjcs6EsF
oQ3eLqo/mml21UfowSBjYWo6xFePogi+ILhfWfq3eDJ6bYEP+ilysQtgfeHXxxx1
sVbTSHfS+hOtIdnsiCZ6j2O10jYaBMEIedJKkakWHXCbaYwYzvZNGOfC9Nxle8Fz
/8q6YlR2R0s=
=6XPy
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



Reply to: